data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3ac/6f3ac23ea037ae44f75d5dbe5279fe94cd6fd178" alt=""
The state las in Massachusettes appear to be yield to pedestrians, which was reinforced many times with supplementary signs in the road and like these that are more substantial pole mounted signs.
I was reviewing the FHWA website on the topic of Safety at Unsignalized Intersections
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5149f/5149fc7c0ba860f31119e49ea960ec5e8444c20d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a53b6/a53b645d31defc80c63bf0e539213ec956fac99b" alt=""
As I walked through Cambridge I came across pedestrian scramble installations and the City uses leading pedestrian intervals (LPI) at most all of the traffic signals. The LPI is a very short duration (most I saw were 3 seconds) which is significant in a cycle length as short as 90 seconds. The City also timed the walk with the countdown, which I argue limits your ability to provide transit signal priority because of the lack of intelligence in the countdown pedestrian indications (they simply repeat the interval in the controller that is flashing don't walk from the previous cycle).
No comments:
Post a Comment